I'm pretty sure this film is a remake of Revenge of the Fallen (the second one). It's the same movie, albeit with more likable side character and a plot that somewhat kinda almost make sense. The horrible destruction befalling Chicago is at least better than watching Shia running in slow motion in a desert with robots doing back-flips behind him for 30 minutes.
NOTE: I erased my last blog over my own review of this film. I did gave it a positive review, given how it's so much better than the second one. A lot of people went to see it came back to tell me how horrible it is. Of course it's horrible. How can you interpret "better than the second one" as "good"?
No comments:
Post a Comment